A research paradigm consists of three elements; ontology, epistemology, and methodology.

研究范式包括三个要素：本体论、认识论和方法论。

Well, technically, we can go into ontology.

好吧，从技术上讲，我们可以深入到本体论。

They have a different ontology to them.

它们具有不同本体论特性。

Stephen's ontology is I don't know what question he's trying to answer.

斯蒂芬本体论在于，我不清楚他试图解答什么问题。

Ontology is the philosophical study of the nature of being.

本体论是哲中研究存在本质。

It's very challenging to fit your data into an ontology.

将你数据适配到本体论中是非常具有挑性。

And spirals play a very big part in my ontology.

螺旋在我本体论中扮演着非常重要。

Metaphors are primarily aesthetic pieces of ontology in the simplest sense of that term.

隐喻主要是本体论美作品， 从最简单意义上讲。

So I spoke a little bit about graffiti's organic development of an ontology.

所以我稍微谈到了涂鸦库在实体论方面有机发展。

And so, You know, many authors have talked about realism as this sort of common sense ontology, right?

因此，你知道，许多作者已经讨论过现实主义， 将其视为一种常识性本体论，对吧？

And that takes things to the next level in terms of being able to have a well-understood ontology.

这在拥有一个well-understood本体论方面将事物提升到了一个新水平。

Types are not, I mean, heck, do you have an ontology of types or just the objects on this table?

类型并不是说，嘿，你是有一个类型本体论还只是桌子上这些对象？

Defining ontologies has always been a very challenging endeavor.

定义本体论始终是一项非常具有挑性任务。

And what that allows developers to do is build an ontology that is better structured for their particular use case.

这使得开发者能够构建一个更适合其特定用例结构化本体。

What does it look like to, let's talk about ontology, right?

我们来谈谈本体论是什么样，好吗？

Are you using ontologies as the underlying representation?

你们是否使用本体论作为底层表示？

In the context retrieval or the code search, you mentioned that you're using ontologies there.

在上下文检索或代码搜索中，你提到在那里使用了本体论。

His arguments both in ontology and perception point to the visual sphere as the derivation of our conceptual apparatus and thought, rather than the other way around.

他在本体论和感知论方面论点都指出， 视觉领域是我们概念设备和思想衍生物，而不是相反。

And so if you are, for example, trying to understand human preferences as an agent that maybe controls a home, building a well-defined ontology can be extremely challenging.

例如， 如果你是一个可能控制家庭代理， 试图理解人类偏好，构建一个定义明确本体论可能会极其具有挑性。

I mean, he wasn't talking about that, he was talking about the perception problem of what the ontology of what defines a car door, this big philosophical question.

我意思是， 他并不是在谈论那个，而是在讨论定义汽车门本体论上感知问题，这是一个很大哲问题。