Does it follow from this that the existing level of real wages accurately measures the marginal disutility of labour?

由此是否可以得出现有实际工水平准确地衡量了劳动力边际负用？

This level cannot be greater than full employment, i.e. the real wage cannot be less than the marginal disutility of labour.

这个水平不能高于充分业， 实际工不能低于劳动边际负用。

The utility of the wage when a given volume of labour is employed is equal to the marginal disutility of that amount of employment.

当雇佣一定数量劳动力时，工用等于该业数量边际负用。

If this is not true, then there is no longer any reason to expect a tendency towards equality between the real wage and the marginal disutility of labour.

如果这不是真，那么不再有任何理由期望实际工与劳动边际负用之间存在趋于平等趋势。

(5) is, therefore, subject to the condition that N cannot exceed the value which reduces the real wage to equality with the marginal disutility of labour.

因此， (5) 条件是 N 不能超过使实际工降低到与劳动边际负用相等价值。

If this is true, the wage-goods equivalent of the existing money-wage is not an accurate indication of the marginal disutility of labour, and the second postulate does not hold good.

如果这是真，那么与现有货币工等价工品不是劳动边际负用准确指示，第二个假设也不成立。

Chapter vi of Professor Carver's Distribution of Wealth clearly envisages interest as the factor which brings into equilibrium the marginal disutility of waiting with the marginal productivity of capital.

Carver 教授财富分配第六章清楚地将利设想为使等待边际负用与本边际生产力达到平衡因素。

The insufficiency of effective demand will inhibit the process of production in spite of the fact that the marginal product of labour still exceeds in value the marginal disutility of employment.

尽管劳动边际产品在价值上仍然超过业边际负用，但有需求不足将抑制生产过程。

It follows from this definition that the equality of the real wage to the marginal disutility of employment presupposed by the second postulate, realistically interpreted, corresponds to the absence of 'involuntary' unemployment.

从这个定义可以看出，实际工等于第二个假设所预设业边际负用，从现实角度解释，对应于不存在“非自愿”失业。

Now, in so far as the classical theory assumes that real wages are always equal to the marginal disutility of labour and that the latter increases when employment increases, so that the labour supply will fall off; cet.

现在，经典理论而言，假设实际工总是等于劳动边际负用，并且后者随着业增加而增加，因此劳动力供给会下降； cet。

For there may be no method available to labour as a whole whereby it can bring the wage-goods equivalent of the general level of money wages into conformity with the marginal disutility of the current volume of employment.

因为对于整个劳动而言，可能没有任何方法可以使相当于一般货币工水平工品与当前业量边际负用相一致。

Thus the volume of employment is not determined by the marginal disutility of labour measured in terms of real wages, except in so far as the supply of labour available at a given real wage sets a maximum level to employment.

因此，业量不是由以实际工衡量劳动力边际负用决定，除非在给定实际工下可用劳动力供应设定了业最高水平。